Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936078Ab3DJLTo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:19:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ye0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]:37362 "EHLO mail-ye0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934789Ab3DJLTn (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:19:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:11:44 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: Pavel Shilovsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] CIFS: Use NT_CREATE_ANDX command for forcemand mounts Message-ID: <20130410071144.08ef2983@corrin.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <1365511227-17626-5-git-send-email-piastry@etersoft.ru> References: <1365511227-17626-1-git-send-email-piastry@etersoft.ru> <1365511227-17626-5-git-send-email-piastry@etersoft.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2730 Lines: 65 On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:40:24 +0400 Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > forcemand mount option now lets us use Windows mandatory style of > byte-range locks even if server supports posix ones - switches on > Windows locking mechanism. Share flags is another locking mehanism > provided by Windows semantic that can be used by NT_CREATE_ANDX > command. This patch combines all Windows locking mechanism in one > mount option by using NT_CREATE_ANDX to open files if forcemand is on. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky > --- > fs/cifs/dir.c | 1 + > fs/cifs/file.c | 6 ++++-- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/dir.c b/fs/cifs/dir.c > index d4331de..8587021 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/dir.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/dir.c > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ cifs_do_create(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry, unsigned int xid, > } > > if (tcon->unix_ext && cap_unix(tcon->ses) && !tcon->broken_posix_open && > + ((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0) && > (CIFS_UNIX_POSIX_PATH_OPS_CAP & > le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability))) { > rc = cifs_posix_open(full_path, &newinode, inode->i_sb, mode, > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c > index 9394b2b..19038a4 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c > @@ -455,8 +455,9 @@ int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > else > oplock = 0; > > - if (!tcon->broken_posix_open && tcon->unix_ext && > - cap_unix(tcon->ses) && (CIFS_UNIX_POSIX_PATH_OPS_CAP & > + if (!tcon->broken_posix_open && tcon->unix_ext && cap_unix(tcon->ses) > + && ((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0) && > + (CIFS_UNIX_POSIX_PATH_OPS_CAP & > le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability))) { > /* can not refresh inode info since size could be stale */ > rc = cifs_posix_open(full_path, &inode, inode->i_sb, > @@ -624,6 +625,7 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool can_flush) > oplock = 0; > > if (tcon->unix_ext && cap_unix(tcon->ses) && > + ((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0) && > (CIFS_UNIX_POSIX_PATH_OPS_CAP & > le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability))) { > /* I'm trying to understand why "forcemand" would matter here. Wouldn't you just want to switch to using NT_CREATE_ANDX if O_DENY* is set instead? What happens if I didn't mount with forcemand and then try to use O_DENY*? -- Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/