Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:40:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:40:27 -0400 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:52961 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:40:08 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15759.35689.846139.896614@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:45:13 -0700 To: Daniel Phillips Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, David Mosberger , "David S. Miller" , dmo@osdl.org, axboe@suse.de, _deepfire@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes In-Reply-To: References: <15759.26918.381273.951266@napali.hpl.hp.com> <15759.35002.179075.973994@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 15 >>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:40:35 +0200, Daniel Phillips said: Daniel> Firm maybe. The current driver does not attempt to do that Daniel> on ia32, and you're saying it should? In that case should Daniel> the driver not have #define DAC_64, or similar? I haven't looked at the complete driver, but yes, it probably needs to have a #define DAC or its runtime-equivalent. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/