Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:57:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:57:49 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:50954 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:57:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:03:02 -0700 From: Dave Olien To: Daniel Phillips Cc: axboe@suse.de, _deepfire@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes Message-ID: <20020923150302.A16033@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20020923120400.A15452@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> <20020923144144.A15852@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from phillips@arcor.de on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:53:47PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1677 Lines: 44 By the way, I don't know how extensive your code reviewing of my changes has been. This morning I sent you the complete driver patch from 2.5.38 to the latest version of the driver. That contains all of the changes I sent you last week, plus new ones. Would it be better for me to send you incremental patches in the future? I could instead generate a patch relative to the previous version of the driver I sent you. Let me know what works better for you, based on where you are in code reviewing. Thanks! On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:53:47PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Monday 23 September 2002 23:41, Dave Olien wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:39:00PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Minor whitespace suggestion: don't worry too much about breaking up > > > lines to fit in 80 columns. It's nice where it works, but where it > > > just makes more lines, don't bother. We are going to go do spelling > > > patches to shorten a lot of those names anyway. > > > > thanks. > > I'd been wondering whether there was a guidline for this. > > I'll relax my 80 column constraints. > > It's a lot more important for core kernel, and ever there, a few lines > tend to break loose here and there. > > Thanks for the test code. Using your recipe, I confirmed I have the > same controller as you. Running on a dual PIII in my case. > > Apparently Jens has a DAC as well. Jens, is it the same? > > -- > Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/