Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934954Ab3DKQmz (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:42:55 -0400 Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:39423 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765434Ab3DKQmy (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:42:54 -0400 Message-ID: <5166E81B.8060507@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:43:07 +0400 From: "Maxim V. Patlasov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miklos Szeredi CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] fuse: process direct IO asynchronously References: <20121214151424.27155.45971.stgit@maximpc.sw.ru> <51669CDF.9090705@parallels.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.30.17.2] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 902 Lines: 25 Hi, 04/11/2013 08:07 PM, Miklos Szeredi пишет: > Hi Maxim, > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Maxim V. Patlasov > wrote: >> Hi Miklos, >> >> Any feedback would be highly appreciated. > What is the order of all these patchsets with regards to each other? They are logically independent, so I formed them to be applied w/o each other. There might be some minor collisions between them (if you try to apply one patch-set on the top of another). So, as soon as you get one of them to fuse-next, I'll update others to be applied smoothly. Either we can settle down some order now, and I'll do it in advance. Thanks, Maxim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/