Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934768Ab3DKSrk (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:47:40 -0400 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:49316 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933304Ab3DKSri (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:47:38 -0400 Message-ID: <51670549.70205@sr71.net> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:47:37 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislaw Gruszka CC: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Hidetoshi Seto Subject: Re: sched/cputime: sig->prev_stime underflow References: <515DBB00.20208@sr71.net> <5162E8DC.4080204@sr71.net> <20130411074529.GA1629@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130411074529.GA1629@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1059 Lines: 23 On 04/11/2013 12:45 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:57:16AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> On 04/04/2013 04:41 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >>> Does this patch fix the issue for you? >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/4/112 >> >> Nope, that doesn't seem to make a difference. I'm still seeing the >> underflow. I'm pretty sure it's already gone to hell by the time it >> gets in to the loop that's patched there. > > Perhaps this is glich introduced by commit > 62188451f0d63add7ad0cd2a1ae269d600c1663d "cputime: Avoid multiplication > overflow on utime scaling" . Could you try to revert it and see if that > helps. If it does not, can you check if problem happen on 3.8 ? I'll run a bit longer, but reverting 62188451f0d63add7ad0cd2a1ae269d600c1663d _does_ seem to make it happier. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/