Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934213Ab3DKSwU (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:52:20 -0400 Received: from 6.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net ([188.165.43.173]:54106 "EHLO mo3.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754678Ab3DKSwS (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:52:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:54:14 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Andrew Victor , Alessandro Zummo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.3 (mo3.mail-out.ovh.net) Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: at91: fix hanged boot Message-ID: <20130411165414.GC25242@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <20130311180611.GF8797@localhost> <1363025279-17615-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> <20130411155505.GD21305@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130411155505.GD21305@localhost> X-PGP-Key: http://uboot.jcrosoft.org/plagnioj.asc X-PGP-key-fingerprint: 6309 2BBA 16C8 3A07 1772 CC24 DEFC FFA3 279C CE7C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16979415021339388849 X-Ovh-Remote: 213.251.161.87 (ns32433.ovh.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -51 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeifedruddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenogfuuhhsphgvtghtffhomhgrihhnucdlgeelmd X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -51 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeifedruddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenogfuuhhsphgvtghtffhomhgrihhnucdlgeelmd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3713 Lines: 89 On 17:55 Thu 11 Apr , Johan Hovold wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > These patches fix a few severe issues affecting most AT91 SOCs where > > boot can hang after a non-general reset, and where the only way to get > > the system booting again is to do a general reset -- something which > > could require physically removing any backup battery. > > Have you had time to look at these patches yet, Nicolas? > > I don't think not having decided on the path forward for DT-support for > rtc-at91sam9 needs to be a blocker. The rtt-nodes will be needed in any > case. > > I could respin the series on top of the DT-patch for rtc-at91rm9200, and > add interrupt and status-disabled properties to the DT-nodes as well. for this this is still a no go this way too much ugly Best Regards, J. > > Thanks, > Johan > > > The problems stem from the fact that the RTC and RTT-peripherals are > > powered by backup power (VDDBU) and are not reset on wake-up, user, > > watchdog or software reset. Consequently, RTC and RTT-alarms and their > > interrupts may be enabled at boot, leading to a system lock-up when an > > interrupt arrives on the shared system-interrupt line before the > > appropriate handler (e.g. RTC-driver) has been installed. > > > > The easiest way to trigger this is to simply wake up from an RTC-alarm > > on at91sam9g45. The RTC-driver currently does not disable interrupts at > > shutdown so even after a clean shut-down the system will always hang > > after waking up. > > > > The first patch fixes this very general case of RTC-wake up after a > > clean shutdown in the RTC-driver and is marked for stable as it is > > perfectly straight-forward. [ Note that the other, RTT-based, AT91 > > RTC-driver already disables its interrupts at shutdown. ] > > > > The more general problem can be triggered, for example, by doing a > > user-reset while updating the RTC-time or if an RTC or RTT-alarm goes > > off after a non-clean shutdown. > > > > To fix this I propose that arch-code should mask the relevant interrupts > > before enabling the system interrupt at early boot, and this is what > > the fifth patch does. To access the RTC-registers I choose to revert a > > recent patch that moved the register definitions to drivers/rtc. > > > > Arguably, the relevant interrupts could also be disabled in bootloaders, > > but I suggest fixing it in the kernel once and for all. > > > > The patches have been tested on at91sam9263 and at91sam9g45 (non-DT), > > and compile-tested for the other SOCs and DT. > > > > Johan > > > > > > v2: > > - add DT-support > > - make sys_irq_mask non-mandatory > > > > > > Johan Hovold (5): > > ARM: at91/rtc: fix boot after RTC wake-up > > ARM: at91/dts: add RTC nodes > > ARM: at91/dts: add RTT nodes > > Revert "arm: at91: move at91rm9200 rtc header in drivers/rtc" > > ARM: at91: fix hanged boot > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". > Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . > Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist > before submitting a driver. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/