Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 01:33:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 01:33:35 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:8859 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 01:33:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:47:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Rusty Russell Cc: jlnance@intrex.net, , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 In-Reply-To: <20020924104030.0e53b95e.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1075 Lines: 29 On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Is this related to the thread library work that IBM was doing or was > > > this independently developed? > > > > independently developed. > > And, ironically, using the futex implementation developed on IBM time 8). you are right, futexes are really important for all the userspace locking primitives and thread-joining. And like basically all core kernel code, futexes were a collaborative effort as well: * Thanks to Ben LaHaise for yelling "hashed waitqueues" loudly * enough at me, Linus for the original (flawed) idea, Matthew * Kirkwood for proof-of-concept implementation. there are so many prerequisites to this that it's impossible to list them all. What i meant above were the specific patches developed for recent 2.5 kernels, and the library itself. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/