Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751419Ab3DNGqo (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 02:46:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ia0-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]:55042 "EHLO mail-ia0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751288Ab3DNGqZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 02:46:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:25:34 -0500 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cfq-iosched: update documentation help for cfq tunnables To: Namjae Jeon Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon , Namjae Jeon , Amit Sahrawat In-Reply-To: <1364698505-22236-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> (from linkinjeon@gmail.com on Sat Mar 30 21:55:04 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.11 Message-Id: <1365873934.18069.96@driftwood> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4698 Lines: 131 Cleaning out "look at this" directory, I don't see this applied upstream but it may already be in Jens' tree. (That's the tree it should go in through...) On 03/30/2013 09:55:04 PM, Namjae Jeon wrote: > From: Namjae Jeon > > Add the documentation text for latency, target_latency & group_idle > tunnable parameters in the block/cfq-iosched.txt. > Also fix few typo(spelling) mistakes. > > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon > Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat > --- > Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt | 47 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt > b/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt > index a5eb7d1..4d02bca 100644 > --- a/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt > +++ b/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ The main aim of CFQ scheduler is to provide a fair > allocation of the disk > I/O bandwidth for all the processes which requests an I/O operation. > > CFQ maintains the per process queue for the processes which request > I/O > -operation(syncronous requests). In case of asynchronous requests, > all the > +operation(synchronous requests). In case of asynchronous requests, > all the > requests from all the processes are batched together according to > their > process's I/O priority. > > @@ -66,6 +66,47 @@ This parameter is used to set the timeout of > synchronous requests. Default > value of this is 124ms. In case to favor synchronous requests over > asynchronous > one, this value should be decreased relative to fifo_expire_async. > > +group_idle > +----------- > +This parameter forces idling at the CFQ group level instead of CFQ You don't need to say "this parameter", you can just start with "Force idling at..." > +queue level. This is introduced after after a bottleneck was observed > +in higher end storage due to idle on sequential queuee and allow > dispatch queuee > +from a single queue. The idea with this parameter is that it be be > run with > +slice_idle=0 and group_idle=8, so that idling does not happen on > individual > +queues in the group but happens overall on the group and still keep > the IO > +controller working. > +Not idling on individual queues in the group will dispatch requests > from > +multiple queues in the group at the same time and achieve higher > throughput > +on higher end storage. > + > +Default value for this parameter is 8ms. > + > +latency > +------- > +This parameter is used to enable/disable the latency mode of the CFQ "Enable/disable the latency mode..." > +scheduler. So if latency mode (called low_latency) is enabled, then > CFQ tries > +to recompute the slice time for each process based on the > target_latency set > +for the system. This favors the fairness over throughput. Disabling > low > +latency (setting it to 0) ignores target latency, allowing each > process in the > +system to get a full time slice. > + > +By default low latency mode is enabled. Why are latency and target_latency separate parameters? (0 already disables it... the logical thing to do...?) I.E. why does this knob even exist separate from target_latency? > +target_latency > +-------------- > +This parameter is used to calculate the time slice for a process if > cfq's > +latency mode is enabled. It will ensure that sync requests have an > estimated > +latency. But sometime if sequential workload is more (e.g. > sequential read), > +then to meet the latency constraints, throughput may decrease > because of less > +time for each process to issue I/O request before the cfq queue is > switched. > + > +Though this can be overcome by disabling the latency_mode, but it > may increase > +the read latency for some applications. So, this parameter allows > for changing > +target_latency through sysfs interface which can provide the balanced > +throughput and read latency. > + > +Default value for target_latency is 300ms. Sorry, I try not to rewrite, but this whole section can just be: Cap outstanding I/O requests to this many miliseconds (default 300), ensuring sync requests have an estimated latency. Lowering this may decrease throughput on sequential workloads by switching queues more often (interleaving other I/O). (And it could ahve been called target_latency_ms to be self-documenting. Oh well.) Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/