Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932515Ab3DOCGU (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 22:06:20 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:42938 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754263Ab3DOCGT (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 22:06:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1365991579.1878.26.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hfs/hfsplus: Convert dprint to hfs_dbg From: Joe Perches To: htl10@users.sourceforge.net Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:06:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1365990973.28177.YahooMailClassic@web172303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1365990973.28177.YahooMailClassic@web172303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1582 Lines: 42 On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 02:56 +0100, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Mon, 15/4/13, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 01:53 +0100, > > Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > > --- On Mon, 8/4/13, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Use a more current logging style. > > [] > > > I have been sitting on a patch which changes this part > > of the code to dynamic debugging, and it is much simplier. [] > > This change wouldn't work well as it would make a mess > > of output that uses no prefix (ie: emits at KERN_DEFAULT) > > with output that uses KERN_DEBUG > > > > That's the reason for _dbg and _dbg_cont. > > Hmm, I don't get it. Is there any *existing* use of dprint > in the hfplus code which is affected by your comment? Code like this prints out currently on a single line at KERN_DEFAULT. @@ -138,16 +138,16 @@ void hfs_bnode_dump(struct hfs_bnode *node) [] for (i = be16_to_cpu(desc.num_recs); i >= 0; off -= 2, i--) { key_off = hfs_bnode_read_u16(node, off); - dprint(DBG_BNODE_MOD, " %d", key_off); + hfs_dbg_cont(BNODE_MOD, " %d", key_off); By converting this dprint() to pr_debug(), it would print out on a multiple lines, one for each read. That's why it should use a mechanism like dbg_cont. btw: there is no current pr_debug_cont mechanism. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/