Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:41:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:40:52 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:22912 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:24:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:29:30 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: Mark Veltzer Cc: Peter Svensson , Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1) In-Reply-To: <200209241519.g8OFJcB26734@www.veltzer.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1055 Lines: 34 On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Mark Veltzer wrote: > On Tuesday 24 September 2002 17:50, Peter Svensson wrote: > > Either you need to educate your users and trust them to > > behave, or you need per user scheduling. > > It is obvious that in high end systems you MUST have per user scheduling > since users will rob each other of cycles.... If Linux is to be a > general purpose operation system it MUST have this feature I just posted a patch for this and will upload the patch to my home page: Subject: [PATCH] per user scheduling for 2.4.19 My patch also allows you to switch the per user scheduling on/off with /proc/sys/kernel/fairsched and has been tested on both UP and SMP. kind regards, Rik -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/