Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752718Ab3DON5E (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:57:04 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:43144 "EHLO mail-ea0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911Ab3DON5D (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:57:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:57:00 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hGblqu1Mq9hWzrfmErTgeoLwK8E Message-ID: Subject: Trouble with full nohz and lttng From: Mats Liljegren To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 882 Lines: 19 When I use lttng, I keep getting ticks. Without lttng, no ticks. It's the same application I run, the same way. The only difference is whether lttng logging has been started or not. The trace says "sched" as reason for not disabled ticks. Using "top" I can't see any extra process/thread being created while my application runs, my application gets 99-101% of the CPU. There are a couple of kworker threads (3), a migration thread and a ksoftirq thread on the same CPU as my application, though "top" gives no indication that they do any execution. Is this a known limitation of lttng, or is there something else going on here? /Mats -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/