Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:01:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:00:55 -0400 Received: from ns.commfireservices.com ([216.6.9.162]:14087 "HELO hemi.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:59:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:04:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Ricky Beam Cc: Linux Kernel Mail List Subject: Re: UP IO-APIC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1040 Lines: 29 On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Ricky Beam wrote: > It works in 2.4, but I've never seen it work in 2.5 -- but I've not compiled > every 2.5.X. Neither the local APIC or IO APIC work in non-SMP configurations I've been using it since inception with local APIC, UP-IOAPIC broke a couple of times only. > due to dependencies on things in mpparse.c (read: SMP functions.) The local > APIC makes perfect sense albeit rare. Single processor IO APICs are very > rare and are usually MP systems with only one processor. ... Or UP machines with chipsets with IOAPICs (Microsoft recommends hardware manufaturers to use one). > APIC support in 2.5 is very closely tied to SMP. (and technically, ACPI.) Not the case for local APIC, i'll try building .38 with UP IOAPIC. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/