Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966300Ab3DQR70 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:59:26 -0400 Received: from co1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.188]:38996 "EHLO co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965369Ab3DQR7X (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:59:23 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.236.101;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BY2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -5 X-BigFish: PS-5(zzbb2dI98dI9371I936eI1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahz8dhz8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h93fhd24he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) From: Matthew Garrett To: Kyle Evans CC: =?utf-8?B?UGFsaSBSb2jDoXI=?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: BUG: Fn keys not working on EliteBook 8460p after fabf85e3ca15d5b94058f391dac8df870cdd427a Thread-Topic: BUG: Fn keys not working on EliteBook 8460p after fabf85e3ca15d5b94058f391dac8df870cdd427a Thread-Index: AQHON+adNavXer7tn0G8FZnibr/8P5jTXnMAgAC464CAAD66gIAAFbyAgASio4CAAYSJAIAAJ70A Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1366221554.13667.13.camel@x230.lan> References: <201304130331.18301@pali> <1365816906.13667.6.camel@x230.lan> <51695169.6090306@gmail.com> <1365870087.13667.7.camel@x230.lan> <51699843.7060905@gmail.com> <1366129583.13667.11.camel@x230.lan> <516EC19C.3010906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <516EC19C.3010906@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.84.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <0A76D03D21EE5F4AB22919E01B293336@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r3HHxW8D011275 Content-Length: 753 Lines: 17 On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 11:37 -0400, Kyle Evans wrote: > On 04/16/2013 12:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Can you try this patch? > > > > No dice. I have a dmi check patch that I will send in a day or two if > you don't find what you are looking for. DMI's almost certainly the wrong solution. According to your DSDT, EC register 0xe6 is called SFHK. That's written to by the SSHK method, which in turn is executed by SHKS which should be called by the hp_wmi_query call added there. Any chance you can try to figure out why that's not happening? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?