Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966193Ab3DQSHR (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:07:17 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:3331 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965485Ab3DQSHN (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:07:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,495,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="319852113" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Simple correctness and speed test for CRCT10DIF hash From: Tim Chen To: Jussi Kivilinna Cc: Herbert Xu , "H. Peter Anvin" , "David S. Miller" , "Martin K. Petersen" , James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , Jim Kukunas , Keith Busch , Erdinc Ozturk , Vinodh Gopal , James Guilford , Wajdi Feghali , linux-kernel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <516EE2D7.5040301@iki.fi> References: <516EE2D7.5040301@iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:07:13 -0700 Message-ID: <1366222033.27102.104.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1730 Lines: 55 On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 20:58 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > On 16.04.2013 19:20, Tim Chen wrote: > > These are simple tests to do sanity check of CRC T10 DIF hash. The > > correctness of the transform can be checked with the command > > modprobe tcrypt mode=47 > > The speed of the transform can be evaluated with the command > > modprobe tcrypt mode=320 > > > > Set the cpu frequency to constant and turn turbo off when running the > > speed test so the frequency governor will not tweak the frequency and > > affects the measurements. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen > > Tested-by: Keith Busch > > > > > +#define CRCT10DIF_TEST_VECTORS 2 > > +static struct hash_testvec crct10dif_tv_template[] = { > > + { > > + .plaintext = "abc", > > + .psize = 3, > > +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN > > + .digest = "\x3b\x44", > > +#else > > + .digest = "\x44\x3b", > > +#endif > > + }, { > > + .plaintext = > > + "abcddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd", > > + .psize = 56, > > +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN > > + .digest = "\xe3\x9c", > > +#else > > + .digest = "\x9c\xe3", > > +#endif > > + .np = 2, > > + .tap = { 28, 28 } > > + } > > +}; > > + > > Are these large enough to test all code paths in the PCLMULQDQ implementation? We have tested the implementation exhaustively for large number of code paths. The tcrypt tests here are only meant for sanity check, and not for exhaustive tests. Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/