Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 02:00:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 02:00:34 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:27793 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 02:00:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:03:50 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andrew Morton , William Lee Irwin III cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.38-mm2 dbench $N times Message-ID: <297318451.1032908628@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <3D9103EB.FC13A744@digeo.com> References: <3D9103EB.FC13A744@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 816 Lines: 20 >> Not sure. This is boot bay SCSI crud, but single-disk FC looks >> *worse* for no obvious reason. Multiple disk tests do much better >> (about matching the el-scruffo PC numbers above). > > dbench 16 on that sort of machine is a memory bandwidth test. > And a dcache lock exerciser. It basically doesn't touch the > disk. Something very bad is happening. Does dbench have any sort of CPU locality between who read it into pagecache, and who read it out again? If not, you stand 7/8 chance of being on the wrong node, and getting 1/20 of the mem bandwidth .... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/