Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967200Ab3DRLsE (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:48:04 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com ([74.125.82.171]:50434 "EHLO mail-we0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966539Ab3DRLsC (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:48:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:56 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, Vinod Koul , Dan Williams , Per Forlin , Rabin Vincent Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply full Device Tree parsing support Message-ID: <20130418114756.GE27903@gmail.com> References: <1366279934-30761-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <201304181306.34835.arnd@arndb.de> <20130418113138.GD27903@gmail.com> <201304181337.32700.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201304181337.32700.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1668 Lines: 49 On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 18 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > > You're right, I am a little confused by them. > > > > I call them 'device type' because that's what they're called already. > > Grep for 'dma_dev_type'. This is the number which gets split into > > event group and line, like this: > > > > event_group = D40_TYPE_TO_GROUP(dev_type); > > event_line = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(dev_type); > > > > > and I would put that number first. > > > > So you want me to switch that round so it looks like: > > > > dmas = < ; > > > > Instead of what I have at the moment: > > > > dmas = < ; > > > > Correct? > > Yes, that's probably better and more in line with what the other > drivers do. You could also put the fixed_chan last if that helps. I'd rather keep the flags as the final cell if it's all the same to you? > I would still like to get a confirmation that we actually still > require the fixed channel assignment, since it's just used > in one driver, and that might only be needed for some buggy > hardware revision if we're lucky. Unfortunately not: `git grep "\.use_fixed_channel" | grep true | wc -l` 8 -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/