Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:56:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:55:52 -0500 Received: from [193.120.224.170] ([193.120.224.170]:52358 "EHLO florence.itg.ie") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:55:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:23:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Jakma To: Ian Stirling cc: Rik van Riel , Subject: Re: Abysmal RAID 0 performance on 2.4.0-test10 for IDE? In-Reply-To: <200012261952.TAA11390@mauve.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Ian Stirling wrote: > The PCI bus can move around 130MB/sec, in bursts yes, but sustained data bandwidth of PCI is a lot lower, maybe 30 to 50MB/s. And you won't get sustained RAID performance > sustained PCI performance. > Anyway, in clarification, Rik mentioned that two reads from different > disk (arrays?) on the same controller at the same time get more or less > the same speed. try scsi. --paulj - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/