Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756675Ab3DRT6q (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:58:46 -0400 Received: from [213.199.154.208] ([213.199.154.208]:3446 "EHLO am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752695Ab3DRT6o (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:58:44 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.236.101;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BY2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: PS-2(zz98dI936eIzz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h93fhd24he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) From: Matthew Garrett To: Matt Fleming CC: Josh Triplett , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Bryan O'Donoghue" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Darren Hart , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove warning in efi_enter_virtual_mode Thread-Topic: [PATCH] Remove warning in efi_enter_virtual_mode Thread-Index: AQHOOrruj8eFhjMAhk2umQbQokvUbJjac+0AgACEpgCAANnTAIAAXQoAgAABTACAAAHtAIAANTAAgAAAw4A= Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:58:03 +0000 Message-ID: <1366315083.13667.19.camel@x230.lan> References: <1366127886-31460-1-git-send-email-bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie> <516EAC4A.6040202@console-pimps.org> <516F1B90.9040508@nexus-software.ie> <516FD24A.3070502@console-pimps.org> <20130418163325.GA6884@leaf> <5170216C.9020300@zytor.com> <20130418164457.GB6884@leaf> <51704FA8.7060801@console-pimps.org> In-Reply-To: <51704FA8.7060801@console-pimps.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.84.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r3IJwpTj019866 Content-Length: 651 Lines: 14 On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 20:55 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > If there are machines out there that would require us to write support, > it's probably worth doing now instead of punting. But it sounds like > there aren't any. I would expect that if there are any 32-bit UEFI systems that ship with BGRT support (and Darren makes it sound like that's a possibility), there's a realistic chance of the BGRT ending up allocated above the highmem barrier. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?