Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:03:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:03:03 -0400 Received: from k100-28.bas1.dbn.dublin.eircom.net ([159.134.100.28]:55824 "EHLO corvil.com.") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:03:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3D91D0F2.5080806@corvil.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:06:26 +0100 From: Padraig Brady Organization: Corvil Networks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Lord CC: Peter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: hdparm -Y hangup References: <3D91CF1E.3080606@pobox.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 29 Mark Lord wrote: > Peter wrote: > >> >> Clarification: is it the case that hdparm -Y (sleep) will cool the >> drive off better than hdparm -y (suspend)? > > > In theory, -Y is capable of greater power (heat) savings than -y, > but in practice this will be model-specific and probably > will pale in comparism to the huge savings from -y alone. True. Is there any chance you could mark -Y (DANGEROUS). Even if it is dangerous currently because of an IDE bug it still is dangerous. >> I read somewhere that -Y only works on unmounted drives. This appears >> to be false. Comments? > > It should work on the raw drive regardless. thanks, P?draig. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/