Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753313Ab3DUQqj (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:46:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33217 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752533Ab3DUQqi (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:46:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:43:33 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Jacob Shin Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, Stephane Eranian , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf: Add hardware breakpoint address mask Message-ID: <20130421164333.GA5328@redhat.com> References: <1365528113-5458-1-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> <1365528113-5458-2-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> <20130420162223.GA13393@redhat.com> <20130420214632.GA6155@jshin-Toonie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130420214632.GA6155@jshin-Toonie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1305 Lines: 39 On 04/20, Jacob Shin wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 06:22:23PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 04/09, Jacob Shin wrote: > > > > > > @@ -612,6 +612,9 @@ static int hw_breakpoint_add(struct perf_event *bp, int flags) > > > if (!(flags & PERF_EF_START)) > > > bp->hw.state = PERF_HES_STOPPED; > > > > > > + if (bp->attr.bp_addr_mask && !arch_has_hw_breakpoint_addr_mask()) > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > + > > > > This is called by sched_in... Isn't it "too late" ? > > > > Perhaps arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() should validate mask/cpu_has_bpext? > > Ah, yes okay. Should I do this for all the archs that HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT ? > > Or is creating HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT_ADDR_MASK and in validate_hw_breakpoint: > > #ifndef HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT_ADDR_MASK > if (bp->attr.bp_addr_mask) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > #endif Or a __weak function overridden in amd.c. I do not know what would be better, up to you. Hmm. But this patch already defines arch_has_hw_breakpoint_addr_mask() for any arch, so validate_hw_breakpoint() can just use it? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/