Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:03:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:03:04 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:58458 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:02:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:02:04 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andi Kleen , dean gaudet , Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp, Alexander Viro , "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Message-ID: <20001030190204.E21935@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20001030162815.B21935@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:36:39PM -0200 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:36:39PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > For stuff like ___wait_on_page(), OTOH, you really want FIFO > wakeup to avoid starvation (yes, I know we're currently doing Sure agreed. In my _whole_ previous email I was only talking about accept. Semaphores file locking etc.. all needs FIFO for fairness as you said. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/