Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755241Ab3DVHMl (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:12:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34177 "EHLO mail-ie0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754640Ab3DVHMk (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:12:40 -0400 Message-ID: <5174E2E0.4030605@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:12:32 +0800 From: Simon Jeons User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zlatko Calusic CC: Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Jiri Slaby , Valdis Kletnieks , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , dormando , Satoru Moriya , Michal Hocko , Linux-MM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 References: <1365505625-9460-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <51672331.6070605@bitsync.net> <20130412193947.GJ11656@suse.de> <5168699A.40407@bitsync.net> <5174DA8F.2020400@bitsync.net> <5174DC17.6000809@gmail.com> <5174DEA0.8010501@bitsync.net> In-Reply-To: <5174DEA0.8010501@bitsync.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2525 Lines: 65 Hi Zlatko, On 04/22/2013 02:54 PM, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > On 22.04.2013 08:43, Simon Jeons wrote: >> Hi Zlatko, >> On 04/22/2013 02:37 PM, Zlatko Calusic wrote: >>> On 12.04.2013 22:07, Zlatko Calusic wrote: >>>> On 12.04.2013 21:40, Mel Gorman wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote: >>>>>> On 09.04.2013 13:06, Mel Gorman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - The only slightly negative thing I observed is that with the patch >>>>>> applied kswapd burns 10x - 20x more CPU. So instead of about 15 >>>>>> seconds, it has now spent more than 4 minutes on one particular >>>>>> machine with a quite steady load (after about 12 days of uptime). >>>>>> Admittedly, that's still nothing too alarming, but... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Would you happen to know what circumstances trigger the higher CPU >>>>> usage? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really nothing special. The server is lightly loaded, but it does >>>> enough >>>> reading from the disk so that pagecache is mostly populated and page >>>> reclaiming is active. So, kswapd is no doubt using CPU time gradually, >>>> nothing extraordinary. >>>> >>>> When I sent my reply yesterday, the server uptime was 12 days, and >>>> kswapd had accumulated 4:28 CPU time. Now, approx 24 hours later (13 >>>> days uptime): >>>> >>>> root 23 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Mar30 4:52 >>>> [kswapd0] >>>> >>>> I will apply your v3 series soon and see if there's any improvement >>>> wrt >>>> CPU usage, although as I said I don't see that as a big issue. It's >>>> still only 0.013% of available CPU resources (dual core CPU). >>>> >>> >>> JFTR, v3 kswapd uses about 15% more CPU time than v2. 2:50 kswapd CPU >>> time after 6 days 14h uptime. >>> >>> And find attached another debugging graph that shows how ANON pages >>> are privileged in the ZONE_NORMAL on a 4GB machine. Take notice that >>> the number of pages in the ZONE_DMA32 is scaled (/5) to fit the graph >>> nicely. >>> >> >> Could you tell me how you draw this picture? >> > > It's a home made server monitoring system. I just added the code > needed to graph the size of active + inactive LRU lists, per zone and > per type. Check out http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/ Thanks Zlatko, I successfully install, could you tell me your options? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/