Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754255Ab3DVKX4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:23:56 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:34091 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751353Ab3DVKXz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:23:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1366626208.2721.12.camel@laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle From: Peter Zijlstra To: Michael Wang Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Alex Shi , Namhyung Kim , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , Ram Pai Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:23:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5164DCE7.8080906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <5164DCE7.8080906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 524 Lines: 14 OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all? Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing wake_affine()? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/