Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754091Ab3DVXid (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:38:33 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:53828 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752707Ab3DVXic (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:38:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:38:30 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alexander Holler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Alessandro Zummo , Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Cameron , Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time; add option hctosys to set time at boot Message-Id: <20130422163830.4aaaef240b1572dc778dd620@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1366384452-14367-4-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> References: <1366384452-14367-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <1366384452-14367-4-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3304 Lines: 102 On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:14:12 +0200 Alexander Holler wrote: > drivers/rtc/hctosys (CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS) doesn't work for > rtc-hid-sensor-time because it will be called in late_init, and thus before > rtc-hid-sensor-time gets loaded. Isn't that true of all RTC drivers which are built as modules? There's nothing special about hid-sensor-time here? I assume the standard answer here is "your RTC driver should be built into vmlinux". If we wish to make things work for modular RTC drivers then we should find a solution which addresses *all* RTC drivers? > To set the time through rtc-hid-sensor-time > at startup, the module now checks by default if the system time is before > 1970-01-02 and sets the system time (once) if this is the case. > > To disable this behaviour, set the module option hctosys to zero, e.g. by > using rtc-hid-sensor-time.hctosys=0 at the kernel command line if the > driver is statically linked into the kernel. Is a bit hacky, no? > @@ -237,6 +279,22 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops hid_time_rtc_ops = { > .read_time = hid_rtc_read_time, > }; > > +struct hid_time_work_time_state { > + struct work_struct work; > + struct hid_time_state *time_state; > +}; > + > +static void hid_time_request_report_work(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct hid_time_state *time_state = > + ((struct hid_time_work_time_state *)work)->time_state; Yikes. Use container_of() here. Also, you don't *have* to initialise things at their definition site. So struct hid_time_state *time_state = some-ginormous-expression-which-overflows-80-columns; becomes struct hid_time_state *time_state; time_state = some-ginormous-expression-which-no-longer-overflows-80-columns; Simple, no? > + /* get a report with all values through requesting one value */ > + sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value( > + time_state->common_attributes.hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TIME, > + hid_time_addresses[0], time_state->info[0].report_id); > + kfree(work); > +} > + > static int hid_time_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > int ret = 0; > @@ -287,6 +345,20 @@ static int hid_time_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(time_state->rtc); > } > > + if (!hid_time_time_set_once && hid_time_hctosys_enabled) { > + /* > + * Request a HID report to set the time. > + * Calling sensor_hub_..._get_raw_value() here directly > + * doesn't work, therefor we have to use a work. > + */ > + struct hid_time_work_time_state *hdwork = > + kmalloc(sizeof(struct hid_time_work_time_state), > + GFP_KERNEL); looky: struct hid_time_work_time_state *hdwork; hdwork = kmalloc(sizeof(*hdwork), GFP_KERNEL); > + hdwork->time_state = time_state; Forgot to check for kmalloc() failure. > + INIT_WORK(&hdwork->work, hid_time_request_report_work); > + schedule_work(&hdwork->work); The patch adds a schedule_work() but no flush_scheduled_work(), etc. So if the driver is shut down or rmmodded while the work is still pending, the kernel will go kapow. > + } > + > return ret; > } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/