Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756110Ab3DWNQA (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:16:00 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49093 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755795Ab3DWNP7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:15:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:15:58 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com Subject: Re: OOM-killer and strange RSS value in 3.9-rc7 Message-ID: <20130423131558.GH8001@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20130417094750.GB2672@localhost.localdomain> <20130417141909.GA24912@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130418101541.GC2672@localhost.localdomain> <20130418175513.GA12581@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130419023345.GE2672@localhost.localdomain> <20130419164310.GA29871@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130422031849.GG2672@localhost.localdomain> <20130422114052.GB18286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130423042234.GH2672@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130423042234.GH2672@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1983 Lines: 55 On Tue 23-04-13 12:22:34, Han Pingtian wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:40:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64=y > > > # CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64 is not set > > > -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU=y > > > +# CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU is not set > > > # CONFIG_CELL_CPU is not set > > > # CONFIG_POWER4_CPU is not set > > > # CONFIG_POWER5_CPU is not set > > > # CONFIG_POWER6_CPU is not set > > > -# CONFIG_POWER7_CPU is not set > > > +CONFIG_POWER7_CPU=y > > > > Wow, so the two configs are for different architectures? Not very much > > helpful. Could you stick with a single machine and do just small updates > > to the config to the point where the problem is no longer present, > > please? > > > No, both configs are for power system. I changed it to > 'CONFIG_POWER7_CPU' by myself in the good one. I think this difference > doesn't matter here. Ohh, good, I thought it was a x86 thingy. Sorry about the confusion. No other arch does that... > > [...] > > > -CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y > > > -# CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set > > > -# CONFIG_SLAB is not set > > > -CONFIG_SLUB=y > > > +CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK=y > > > +CONFIG_SLAB=y > > > > I would start with the bad config and SLUB changed to SLAB in the first > > step, though. > > > Yep, after I changed bad config to use SLAB, the problem disppears after > using the new kernel. Looks like something wrong in SLUB? It seems so or maybe there is a different issue which is just made visible by SLUB or it is an arch specific problem. What is the workload that triggers this behavior? Can you reduce it to a minimum test case? I guess that you are still testing with vanilla 3.9-rc? kernel without any additional patches or 3rd party modules, right? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/