Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757050Ab3DWP6F (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:58:05 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:9307 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756610Ab3DWP6D (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:58:03 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=UY7TuduN c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=xjrUfgc_UIsA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=9zoxqyHsefMA:10 a=eX07Har57EoM37cZ22kA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1366732681.9609.157.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tools: Introduce new 'ftrace' command From: Steven Rostedt To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , David Ahern , Stephane Eranian Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:58:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1366705872-12132-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> References: <1366705872-12132-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:30 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset implements a front-end tool for kernel's ftrace. It > uses function_graph tracer by default and normal function tracer is > also supported. (Of course you need to enable those tracers in your > kernel first.) > > NOTE: It's in very early stage, so may contain many rough edges. > Very nice Namhyung, thanks for doing this. I did a quick run through of the patches and I have no complaints about them. I'm not sure how the others will feel about it. Also, have you given thought on how to execute both ftrace and the pmu counters? That is, to get a way to interleave the data? I added a 'perf' clock to ftrace. I didn't see that being checked, although I didn't look too hard. If possible, you can use that, as well as the multi-buffers that are coming in 3.10. I would also like to add a system call to allow you to get to the ftrace data without the need for debugfs. I'm not sure if we should piggy back on the perf system call, or add a new one. I'm thinking we should add a new one so that it doesn't get too confusing. Hope others have comments, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/