Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932246Ab3DWQG6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:06:58 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:45105 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932117Ab3DWQGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:06:55 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,534,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="323074703" From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v2] numa, cpu hotplug: Change links of CPU and node when changing node number by onlining CPU References: <5170D4CB.20900@jp.fujitsu.com> <20130422153541.04ba682f13910cfede0d2ff7@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:06:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130422153541.04ba682f13910cfede0d2ff7@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:35:41 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 19 Andrew Morton writes: > > Would it not be better to fix this by assigning those CPUs to their real, > memoryless node right at the initial boot? Or is there something in > the kernel which makes cpus-on-a-memoryless-node not work correctly? I probably added this originally. The original reason was that long ago the VM was broken with memory less nodes. These days it is likely obsolete. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/