Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:33:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:33:01 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:59352 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:32:05 -0400 Message-ID: <3D928EFB.8EA00EB2@digeo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:37:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-rc5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] increase traffic on linux-kernel References: <3D928864.23666D93@digeo.com> <20020926043208.GD1790@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2002 04:37:16.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[63F0DA50:01C26516] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 20 Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:09:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Infrastructure to detect sleep-inside-spinlock bugs. Really only > > useful if compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y. It prints out a whiny > > message and a stack backtrace if someone calls a function which might > > sleep from within an atomic region. > > Why not make this it's own config option, dependent on CONFIG_PREEMPT? > With CONFIG_PREEMPT=n, it'll detect might-sleep-inside-interrupt bugs. Some value there I guess. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/