Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755911Ab3DXPBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:01:50 -0400 Received: from tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.14]:39193 "EHLO tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755342Ab3DXPBt (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:01:49 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.236.101;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BY2PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: PS-2(zz98dI936eIda00hdc73hzz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h93fhd24hd2bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) From: Matthew Garrett To: Matt Fleming CC: Josh Boyer , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Check EFI revision in setup_efi_vars Thread-Topic: [PATCH] efi: Check EFI revision in setup_efi_vars Thread-Index: AQHOQPlQHRjt8E2oC0WuAZ0KRwVwspjlcoEAgAAC4oCAAACkgIAAATSA Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:01:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1366815685.9976.0.camel@x230> References: <20130424143738.GB15272@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> <5177EFCE.80104@intel.com> <20130424145449.GC15272@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> <5177F2C3.5080907@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5177F2C3.5080907@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.84.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r3OF1t9B021720 Content-Length: 460 Lines: 11 On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 15:57 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > I presume that if that were true, virt_efi_query_variable_info() (which > is called indirectly from the efivars code) would have exploded before > now. Matthew? Yeah, it's probably safe to lose it. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?