Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:05:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:05:34 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:17159 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:05:28 -0500 Message-ID: <39FDB775.45E5653C@timpanogas.org> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:01:25 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" Organization: TRG, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Evans CC: Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar , "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Evans wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > functionality that needs high performance completly in kernel? People > > may need to write high performance network code for custom protocols, > > this way they will end creating kernel modules with system-crashing > > bugs, memory leaks and kernel buffer overflows (chroot+nobody+logging > > won't work anymore). (plus they will get into pain while debugging) > > I'm glad _someone_ is connected to reality with regards the security > implications of throwing loads of servers into kernel space. > If we implement a ring 0 Linux, all of this will remain intact with the need to port modules into the kernel at all. Jeff > Cheers > Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/