Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 03:32:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 03:32:39 -0400 Received: from math.uci.edu ([128.200.174.70]:21909 "EHLO math.uci.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 03:32:38 -0400 From: Eric Olson Message-Id: <200209260737.AAA15831@math.uci.edu> Subject: Channel Bonding To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: ejolson@math.uci.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 964 Lines: 30 I've been using channel bonding with Linux kernel 2.4.17. I recently tried the standard kernel 2.4.19 but ifconfig bond0 ... hangs. The bonding module gets loaded. The message bond0 registered without MII link monitoring, in bonding mode. appears in the system log. But then ifconfig hangs and kill -9 ... won't kill it. Furthermore running ifconfig again locks the entire system up. Configuration is the same as for my working 2.4.17 kernel. This appears to be a bug to me. Is anyone using bonding with 2.4.19? Is this a known issue with 2.4.19? Is there something that needs to be done differently with 2.4.19 than with 2.4.17? Please copy me directly on replies to this message. Thanks, Eric Olson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/