Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755599Ab3DZMQX (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:16:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]:38701 "EHLO mail-ob0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751427Ab3DZMQV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:16:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130426114622.GB3736@osiris> References: <1366962706-24204-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> <20130426112539.GA3736@osiris> <20130426114622.GB3736@osiris> From: Xi Wang Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:15:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Russell King , Eric Dumazet , Will Drewry , Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 662 Lines: 20 On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > And build fine on s390. Thanks! >> Btw. are there any test cases around for BPF JIT? >> Not only for the new seccomp but also netfilter? > > This however is still a valid question. Not sure about test cases for BPF JIT in general. I used the examples under "samples/seccomp/" for testing; they are seccomp filters though. - xi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/