Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:54:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:54:26 -0400 Received: from [217.167.51.129] ([217.167.51.129]:25585 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:54:25 -0400 From: "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" To: Cc: "Linus Torvalds" Subject: [RFC] {read,write}s{b,w,l} or iobarrier_*() Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:59:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20020926155941.3602@192.168.4.1> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 4.0.1 carbon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2116 Lines: 53 Hi ! Here I need people to agree so we decide once for all what we want and move further (this has been discussed several times already withotu agreement). So, the "generic" problem is: reading/writing from/to a FIFO that is larger than 8 bits wide on a big endian machine requires more than just a loop of reads or writes. Those IO functions are doing byteswap (and barriers on every call) while the FIFO access wants typically to be not byteswapped nor have barriers on every access. For "PIO", we already provide the "s" functions {in,out}s{b,w,l} that are implemented by every arch and provide drivers with a good abstraction to use (see ide_insw/ide_outsw in 2.5 which should just be a simple insw/outsw for normal interfaces for example). However, we don't provide a similar abstraction for MMIO. Typical cases where we want this is MMIO versions of the IDE iops (we probably want to provide generic impl of both PIO and MMIO ones in ide-iops, not just PIO); some sound cards, etc... A driver needing that today will have to either use a loop of {read,write}{b,w,l} and undo byteswapping (ugh), or try to re-implement it using raw_{read,write}{b,w,l} and adding proper iobarrier_* where needed. But the iobarrier functions aren't provided by all archs which means ugly #ifdef salad, and I hate having to put the burden of knowing everything about barriers one each single driver maintainer. So we have 2 solutions here (one of which I prefer, but I still want the debate open here): - Have all archs provide {read,write}s{b,w,l} functions. Those will hide all of the details of bytewapping & barriers from the drivers and can be used as-is for things like IDE MMIO iops. - Have all archs provide iobarrier_* functions. Here, drivers would still have to re-implement the transfer loops with raw_{read,write}{b,w,l} and do proper use of iobarrier_*. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/