Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757771Ab3D2QGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:06:23 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:31882 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757741Ab3D2QGU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:06:20 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree From: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <20130429154541.GI17268@fieldses.org> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:05:51 -0400 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Simo Sorce , Trond Myklebust Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <09A69F90-5D9A-4AF6-9B7D-CC1D74A237EA@oracle.com> References: <20130429112434.dcc80cfce804beeacc68793a@canb.auug.org.au> <20130429154541.GI17268@fieldses.org> To: "J. Bruce Fields" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2088 Lines: 55 On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> >> On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >>> Hi J., >>> >>> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >>> >>> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c: In function 'gss_proxy_save_rsc': >>> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:1182:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'gss_mech_get_by_OID' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>> >>> Caused byc ommit 030d794bf498 ("SUNRPC: Use gssproxy upcall for server >>> RPCGSS authentication"). gss_mech_get_by_OID() made static to >>> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c by commit 9568c5e9a61d ("SUNRPC: >>> Introduce rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor()") in the nfs tree (part of the nfs >>> tree that you did not merge). >>> >>> I don't know how to fix this, so I have used the nfsd tree from >>> next-20130426 for today. >> >> Bruce, it might make sense for me to submit the three server-side RPC GSS patches, and then you can rebase the gssproxy work on top of those. Let me know how you would like to proceed. > > I'm happy to take those patches whenever you consider them ready. Would > that fix the problem? Someone would need to modify the gssproxy patches to use the new interfaces. > Also: it looks like 030d794bf498 "SUNRPC: Introduce > rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor()" is in Trond's linux-next, but not his > nfs-for-next. I'm not sure what that means--is it safe to rebase on top > of *that*? That doesn't seem right to me. > I was hoping I could consider the gss-proxy work committed at this point > and pile any fixes on top, but... whatever works for you guys, I guess. > > --b. -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/