Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757499Ab3D2RNq (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:13:46 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:44899 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757236Ab3D2RNo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:13:44 -0400 Message-ID: <517EAA2D.1000407@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:13:17 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (many build errors when PROC_FS is not set -- part 1) References: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1976 Lines: 43 On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130426: > Many build errors happen when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. This is not new -- I also saw it about 2 weeks ago but did not analyze or report it. use of PDE_DATA() (from ): drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_ap.c:85:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/afs/proc.c:193:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drivers/block/pktcdvd.c:2598:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/ext4/super.c:1809:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2263:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/jbd2/journal.c:982:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] net/sunrpc/cache.c:1465:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:2842:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drivers/gpu/drm/drm_proc.c:66:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] net/can/proc.c:381:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] net/can/bcm.c:229:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Al, would it make sense to have a stub for PDE_DATA() in when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled? -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/