Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 01:06:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 01:06:49 -0400 Received: from sullivan.realtime.net ([205.238.132.76]:16140 "EHLO sullivan.realtime.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 01:06:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:11:58 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200209270511.g8R5Bwj14803@sullivan.realtime.net> From: Milton Miller To: ajm@sgi.com (Alan Mayer) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cirqs on large machines Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 679 Lines: 20 I looked at this patch again, and it makes no sense. It would simply sum the unrelated IRQ % IRQvec irqs into a meaningless number. If you don't want the space taken up in kstat, then you should expand on the three ifdefs to something like this: < #if !define(CONFIG_ARCH_S390) -- > #if !define(CONFIG_ARCH_S390) && !defined(CONFIG_YOUR_BIG_NUMA) PS: sparc and sparc64 appear to have sparse irq space too: see __irq_itoa milton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/