Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 02:28:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 02:28:57 -0400 Received: from beppo.feral.com ([192.67.166.79]:38671 "EHLO beppo.feral.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 02:28:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:33:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Jens Axboe cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , "Pedro M. Rodrigues" , Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Warning - running *really* short on DMA buffers while doing file transfers In-Reply-To: <20020927061328.GL5646@suse.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 479 Lines: 13 > 2.4 layer is most horrible there, 2.5 at least gets rid of the old > scsi_dma crap. That said, 253 default depth is a bit over the top, no? Why? Something like a large Hitachi 9*** storage system can take ~1000 tags w/o wincing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/