Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759722Ab3EBNqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2013 09:46:51 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:37339 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759622Ab3EBNqt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2013 09:46:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 15:46:46 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Oliver Neukum Cc: Colin Cross , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , arve@android.com, Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] freezer: add new freezable helpers using freezer_do_not_count() Message-ID: <20130502134646.GA24576@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1367271946-7239-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <1367271946-7239-4-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <20130502124826.GE22618@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <4717747.DX2SLP8TIR@linux-5eaq.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4717747.DX2SLP8TIR@linux-5eaq.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1843 Lines: 40 On Thu 2013-05-02 15:05:13, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Thursday 02 May 2013 14:48:26 Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2013-04-29 14:45:39, Colin Cross wrote: > > > Freezing tasks will wake up almost every userspace task from > > > where it is blocking and force it to run until it hits a > > > call to try_to_sleep(), generally on the exit path from the syscall > > > it is blocking in. On resume each task will run again, usually > > > restarting the syscall and running until it hits the same > > > blocking call as it was originally blocked in. > > > > Ok, so you are optimizing suspend at the cost of runtime operations, > > right? > > > > Would it make sense to do suspends entirely without freezer in your > > configurations? With the right drivers, it should work ok. > > Right now drivers now that they will not be busy when runtime > suspend happens. The freezer has the same effect for system PM. > If you remove that certainty it becomes impossible for simple drivers > to declare their devices busy upon open and do no synchronization > between IO and PM. I know. Drivers can mostly ignore suspend. But android people do suspend multiple times a second, and are optimizing freezer. I'm suggesting they should take a look at their drivers, and perhaps they can optimize freezer out totally. (Or perhaps switch to n900-like solution, and avoid suspend entirely. They keep machines functioning in suspend mode. That aint no suspend.) Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/