Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:19:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:19:38 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:19073 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:19:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:24:41 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Matthew Jacob Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , "Pedro M. Rodrigues" , Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Warning - running *really* short on DMA buffers while doing file transfers Message-ID: <20020927072441.GT5646@suse.de> References: <20020927065610.GQ5646@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 23 On Fri, Sep 27 2002, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > So I think the 'more tags the better!' belief is very much bogus, at > > least for the common case. > > Well, that's one theory. Numbers talk, theory spinning walks Both Andrew and I did latency numbers for even small depths of tagging, and the result was not pretty. Sure this is just your regular plaino SCSI drives, however that's also what I care most about. People with big-ass hardware tend to find a way to tweak them as well, I'd like the typical systems to run fine out of the box though. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/