Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:24:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:24:42 -0400 Received: from beppo.feral.com ([192.67.166.79]:58127 "EHLO beppo.feral.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:24:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:29:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Jens Axboe cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , "Pedro M. Rodrigues" , Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Warning - running *really* short on DMA buffers while doing file transfers In-Reply-To: <20020927072441.GT5646@suse.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 30 On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27 2002, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > So I think the 'more tags the better!' belief is very much bogus, at > > > least for the common case. > > > > Well, that's one theory. > > Numbers talk, theory spinning walks > > Both Andrew and I did latency numbers for even small depths of tagging, > and the result was not pretty. Sure this is just your regular plaino > SCSI drives, however that's also what I care most about. People with > big-ass hardware tend to find a way to tweak them as well, I'd like the > typical systems to run fine out of the box though. > Fair enough. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/