Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761641Ab3EBS22 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2013 14:28:28 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:42816 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759291Ab3EBS21 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2013 14:28:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:28:12 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Will Deacon , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Message-ID: <20130502182812.GD14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130502171516.GA3040@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 20 On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > ping > > > > Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree? > > I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc > tree, after Russell acks them. Okay, well, is there a reason for them to go through arm-soc? They look more like core code to me than SoC specific - they only minimally touch mach-virt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/