Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933259Ab3ECPey (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 11:34:54 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39222 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932944Ab3ECPex (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 11:34:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 17:34:50 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Han Pingtian , LKML , penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: OOM-killer and strange RSS value in 3.9-rc7 Message-ID: <20130503153450.GA18709@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <0000013e427023d7-9456c313-8654-420c-b85a-cb79cc3c4ffc-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130426062436.GB4441@localhost.localdomain> <0000013e46cba821-d5c54c99-3b5c-4669-9a54-9fb8f4ee516f-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130427112418.GC4441@localhost.localdomain> <0000013e5645b356-09aa6796-0a95-40f1-8ec5-6e2e3d0c434f-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130429145711.GC1172@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130502105637.GD4441@localhost.localdomain> <0000013e65cb32b3-047cd2d6-dfc8-41d2-a792-9b398f9a1baf-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130503030345.GE4441@localhost.localdomain> <0000013e6aff6f95-b8fa366e-51a5-4632-962e-1b990520f5a8-000000@email.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0000013e6aff6f95-b8fa366e-51a5-4632-962e-1b990520f5a8-000000@email.amazonses.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1251 Lines: 33 On Fri 03-05-13 15:25:25, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2013, Han Pingtian wrote: > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:10:15PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Han Pingtian wrote: > > > > > > > Looks like "ibmvscsi" + "slub" can trigger this problem. > > > > > > And the next merge of the slab-next tree will also cause SLAB to trigger > > > this issue. I would like to have this fixes. The slab allocator purpose is > > > to servr objects that are a fraction of a page and not objects that are > > > larger than the maximum allowed sizes of the page allocator. > > > > So the problem is in memory management code, not in ibmvscis? And looks > > like there is a fix already? > > Both should be fixed. Could you point to the specific commit(s), please? > Making requests for large amounts of memory from an allocator that is > supposed to hand out fraction of a page does not make sense. AFAIR there were lots of objects in size-512 as well. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/