Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762903Ab3ECQzg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 12:55:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:62717 "EHLO mail-ie0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753486Ab3ECQze (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 12:55:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130503185148.600554bd@endymion.delvare> References: <20130503185148.600554bd@endymion.delvare> From: Grant Likely Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 17:55:14 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uZ1zbEYJF6_0V_ZtDJ04bMglBDI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] GPIO for v3.10 To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linus Torvalds , Marek Vasut , Linus Walleij , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Samuel Ortiz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 897 Lines: 20 On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Fri, 3 May 2013 09:14:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The real problem here is that two patches which depended on each other > went to you through 2 different maintainer trees (mfd maintained by > Samuel Ortiz and gpio maintained by Grant L. & Linus W.), and the git > pull requests reached you in the wrong order. That doesn't make us all > irresponsible and lame contributors/maintainers, does it? Actually, it does make us (me) wrong and irresponsible. It should never have happened because dependencies should never be committed to different trees. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/