Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:34:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:34:52 -0400 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:53955 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:34:51 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200209271639.UAA21514@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org (YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:39:45 +0400 (MSD) Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20020928.011439.108856769.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> from "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=" at Sep 28, 2 01:14:39 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 17 Hello! > (*) Oops, I slipped at (almost) end of the patch when making patch... sorry; > I inteded to refine timing into ~0.5 sec at worst; Does this matter? What is special about 0.5sec comparing to 1? > (do I need to resend complete patch?) No, I think. Deletion of bad debugging is easier to make after patching. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/