Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753241Ab3EFMrU (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 08:47:20 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56181 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753087Ab3EFMrT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 08:47:19 -0400 X-Authenticated: #7313500 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+UYdli+C2UoVd4OlHiF4o6+VeSGvnN05L349EVuH uk7cB7b1MNI5w+ From: Jan-Simon =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= To: pageexec@freemail.hu Cc: Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , airlied@linux.ie, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Fix declaration of intel_gmbus_{is_forced_bit/is_port_falid} in i915 driver. Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 14:46:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4246338.ENCyMUo2HP@aragorn.auenland.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.7.10-1.1-desktop; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5184CD16.8569.184037FF@pageexec.freemail.hu> References: <1367572662-18400-1-git-send-email-dl9pf@gmx.de> <87k3ngtgme.fsf@intel.com> <5184CD16.8569.184037FF@pageexec.freemail.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1241 Lines: 41 Ok, so let me resend a version with "static inline" . Best, JS On Saturday 04 May 2013 10:55:50 PaX Team wrote: > On 3 May 2013 at 15:03, Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> This fixes a compilation issue with clang. An initial version of this > > >> patch > > >> was developed by PaX Team . > > >> This is respin of this patch. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon M?ller > > >> CC: pageexec@freemail.hu > > >> CC: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch > > >> CC: airlied@linux.ie > > >> CC: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > >> CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > >> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch. > > > > Please drop it. > > > > The patch removes the inline keyword, creating dozens of copies of the > > > functions, and consequently loads of warnings: > in my original patch they were both static inline, not sure where the > inline got lost... -- Dipl.-Ing. Jan-Simon M?ller jansimon.moeller@gmx.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/