Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754509Ab3EFRZB (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 13:25:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33726 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754121Ab3EFRZA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 13:25:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 20:24:55 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov To: Xiao Guangrong Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , avi.kivity@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all shadow pages Message-ID: <20130506172455.GB18963@redhat.com> References: <1367032402-13729-1-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1367032402-13729-5-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130503010534.GA5467@amt.cnet> <51835087.8090605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130503155302.GB3362@amt.cnet> <5183EAFA.4050500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130504005201.GA11823@amt.cnet> <518725DF.5090503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130506123625.GB12349@redhat.com> <5187ABB3.7020403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5187ABB3.7020403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3059 Lines: 79 On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:10:11PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > On 05/06/2013 08:36 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > >>> Step 1) Fix kvm_mmu_zap_all's behaviour: introduce lockbreak via > >>> spin_needbreak. Use generation numbers so that in case kvm_mmu_zap_all > >>> releases mmu_lock and reacquires it again, only shadow pages > >>> from the generation with which kvm_mmu_zap_all started are zapped (this > >>> guarantees forward progress and eventual termination). > >>> > >>> kvm_mmu_zap_generation() > >>> spin_lock(mmu_lock) > >>> int generation = kvm->arch.mmu_generation; > >>> > >>> for_each_shadow_page(sp) { > >>> if (sp->generation == kvm->arch.mmu_generation) > >>> zap_page(sp) > >>> if (spin_needbreak(mmu_lock)) { > >>> kvm->arch.mmu_generation++; > >>> cond_resched_lock(mmu_lock); > >>> } > >>> } > >>> > >>> kvm_mmu_zap_all() > >>> spin_lock(mmu_lock) > >>> for_each_shadow_page(sp) { > >>> if (spin_needbreak(mmu_lock)) { > >>> cond_resched_lock(mmu_lock); > >>> } > >>> } > >>> > >>> Use kvm_mmu_zap_generation for kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot. > >>> Use kvm_mmu_zap_all for kvm_mmu_notifier_release,kvm_destroy_vm. > >>> > >>> This addresses the main problem: excessively long hold times > >>> of kvm_mmu_zap_all with very large guests. > >>> > >>> Do you see any problem with this logic? This was what i was thinking > >>> we agreed. > >> > >> No. I understand it and it can work. > >> > >> Actually, it is similar with Gleb's idea that "zapping stale shadow pages > >> (and uses lock break technique)", after some discussion, we thought "only zap > >> shadow pages that are reachable from the slot's rmap" is better, that is this > >> patchset does. > >> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/23/73) > >> > > But this is not what the patch is doing. Close, but not the same :) > > Okay. :) > > > Instead of zapping shadow pages reachable from slot's rmap the patch > > does kvm_unmap_rmapp() which drop all spte without zapping shadow pages. > > That is why you need special code to re-init lpage_info. What I proposed > > was to call zap_page() on all shadow pages reachable from rmap. This > > will take care of lpage_info counters. Does this make sense? > > Unfortunately, no! We still need to care lpage_info. lpage_info is used > to count the number of guest page tables in the memslot. > > For example, there is a memslot: > memslot[0].based_gfn = 0, memslot[0].npages = 100, > > and there is a shadow page: > sp->role.direct =0, sp->role.level = 4, sp->gfn = 10. > > this sp is counted in the memslot[0] but it can not be found by walking > memslot[0]->rmap since there is no last mapping in this shadow page. > Right, so what about walking mmu_page_hash for each gfn belonging to the slot that is in process to be removed to find those? -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/