Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758098Ab3EFVYw (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 17:24:52 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:59865 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756536Ab3EFVYv (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 17:24:51 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Pavel Machek , tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: dw_apb_timer_of.c: remove parts that were picoxcell-specific Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:24:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-18-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jamie Iles , dinguyen@altera.com, wd@denx.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, olof@lixom.net, kernel list , john.stultz@linaro.org References: <20130426121433.GA16249@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <201305061545.22587.arnd@arndb.de> <20130506155304.GA6645@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20130506155304.GA6645@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305062324.17080.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:A1H+Le555DIjks/htytO+qdpbfiuzvVCu0r3uVMOTnE Rd2yLoDk9t63XIk3u6JtFC0EIy6s4mVH+hLJ0Z3IFGD1DrdHaN HxZ0vdPwXvttuHceH1HSFlrE8ITp/yYVrzfuEfN+sYN/3YgQdX K8JMMIUXrHa2+eR26RwHKm9i2FD+0lrlwEjHe9wm+E8XwEiwpr S618QuzhJri4GvHmlEd2TVKNNDcQhH4f0CTEsLKozbrwMTvfgr uE0oIMinXjtf27HqWt6Sv1enJDfSlY6MtBCeM0Fn6mGKFspk4S 2xhsyh6y74hu2CBQ/bK0ek2r2Nn5x4nVe8KN4MIGLIjMLZV76j 4706RwwAYR1r7P3/zrmA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1279 Lines: 33 On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2013-05-06 15:45:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on > > > Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him, too. > > > > > > It brings two platforms closer together, and makes time actually work > > > on socfpga. It would be good to get it applied. > > > > Who should apply it? I guess it needs to go through arm-soc with all the > > other clocksource changes already queued up there. Can we have an Ack > > from Jamie and from the clocksource maintainers? > > Well, changes to arch/arm/mach-picoxcell are single line (and that's a > cleanup of duplicate include). The point is that Jamie had comments on the earlier version, so it would be good to see his Ack on the current one. > So I guess it should go through the timekeeping tree...? I would prefer that, but we can also take it through arm-soc, it doesn't really matter. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/