Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262647AbSI0XBY>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:01:24 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262648AbSI0XBY>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:01:24 -0400
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:45897 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262647AbSI0XBX>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:01:23 -0400
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <200209272306.g8RN64v26436@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Updated SCx200 patches
To: christer@weinigel.se (Christer Weinigel)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:06:04 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       alan@redhat.com, zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz, rob@osinvestor.com
In-Reply-To: <87ptuz2g78.fsf@zoo.weinigel.se> from "Christer Weinigel" at Sep 28, 2002 12:58:03 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 628
Lines: 14

> I've have updated my SCx200 patches to match the latest Bitkeeper
> tree.  Would you consider this patch for inclusion in the kernel?


They look good but they want to go into 2.5 first really. 2.5 is becoming
actually usable for development/testing and we already have a large enough
collection of 2.4 stuff missing from 2.5

If it goes into 2.5 then I'm all for it going into 2.4
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/