Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:21:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:21:46 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:37014 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:21:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020927.182001.122314480.davem@redhat.com> To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200209271639.UAA21514@sex.inr.ac.ru> References: <20020928.011439.108856769.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <200209271639.UAA21514@sex.inr.ac.ru> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 17 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:39:45 +0400 (MSD) > (do I need to resend complete patch?) No, I think. Deletion of bad debugging is easier to make after patching. I've applied the patch with the time_after() debugging check removed to both 2.4.x and 2.5.x If, after discussion, the "HZ --> HZ/2" change needs to be made, just send another patch on top of previous one, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/