Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757412Ab3EGKpq (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 06:45:46 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:44095 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755485Ab3EGKpo (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 06:45:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:45:02 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: gg@slimlogic.co.uk, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, balbi@ti.com, ldewangan@nvidia.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rob@landley.net, ruchika@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, sameo@linux.intel.com Message-ID: <20130507104502.GQ7478@sirena.org.uk> References: <1362662506-14823-4-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1367846225-15685-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <20130506144010.GF13472@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <51888D55.3090907@ti.com> <20130507075824.GM7478@sirena.org.uk> <5188CD9C.6010602@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V2tfspbppmK1TQo2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5188CD9C.6010602@ti.com> X-Cookie: You have no real enemies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.42.102.178 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: Palmas Extcon Driver X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1975 Lines: 50 --V2tfspbppmK1TQo2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:17:08PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 01:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>The platform can provide it's own vbus control in which case this is > >>not needed. > >So why is there no interaction with this external VBUS control and how > >does the driver distinguish between that and an error getting the > >regulator? > The platform specifies if it provides its own VBUS control by the dt > property ti,no_control_vbus. So the driver will give an error only > when *ti,no_control_vbus* is not set. Graeme? That doesn't answer the question about why there's no interaction with the external control... --V2tfspbppmK1TQo2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRiNsrAAoJELSic+t+oim9qssP/3toUma31SzGARXn8T40l8xy sKVqci35ErrhapClrJUupVjmd7fOGaTrY86AF+ZHisKjwFc6HYjvGF4BfqAxjVtv /u12U7xN6e16lsj3coH8l3BdYo1LLDHaixZMlRAZ9+Z2i5CGShij5KzfDjA2nVGe De1s96eTnbi8yV9eceFpcSqsHhlxEOUugmlgbv3ZMCczOfVIdVBMxz5y89J2Jdjf D4ePYT7KsH/uJpx6BwWjnja2j2fu0gyyqWte2niWf+lfhXCwNf9n8Ed9RCQcED8e 1+6D1UL/dHFruc+LGlHwQrHzxRlmNha5Ug22DEmCTFHIvJ0W3oqA5GpaCgccNfWL xE3ELvcZzqSvQKOnuAynRO5MFb5KvbwSVOBQPnMBpcQrTFIr4gqxaL7/bTmy2P7Z P07G35MpGooqp3fdJXFcpG9BEKEwXnGdJstC5NeWIyLR5+mcBBCONcz6lqQktlel 9OFc4gv/rivjr1rJxuOWXZqmELJ38SjNAjWQLVq2RzfZsIDcL+ic5HYtvseThOoL LN3kOBIH6MnQUqr6UWWoyDRvfP4ew6xFUbMTtA0Zdg3dB4b2DzLxsgJWWebJifeq Vm3rJTu9aZL+1Nyyg+fv2RGGv5vmYRI5repayHIYW0f69r15yfu0UxeuxekjkI/7 iOboRMf+NLENGsHkzQme =jwqy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V2tfspbppmK1TQo2-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/